The graph and pie chart below give information on in-house training courses in a large financial company.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
This report derives from two graphs illustrating the duration of in-house training courses in relation to types as well as the proportion of managers and secretaries view on these various programs.
Generally speaking, technical, and career development courses accounted for the major training hours. By contrast, the most managers and secretaries see these programs as an important part of jobs.
Looking into the pie chart, Half of the total program time was invested in technical courses followed by career development that was responsible for nearly a quarter of the sub-total. Health and safety had the least duration while the timing utilized on inter-personal skills was almost double of it with 5 and 10 respectively.
In the case of the bar diagram, the greatest percentage of secretaries and managers rated these programs as an essential part of employment with around 84% and 78% respectively. Moreover, about 50% managers believe these are good for net working whereas the proportion of secretaries with the same idea was more or less 42%. The number of those who regard the courses as a waste of time was never as high as 12%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, moreover, so, well, whereas, while, as well as, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14438502674 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87697552814 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609625668449 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.088768689 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.25 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0810726076266 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0362836388154 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435749603574 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.058181670577 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417617428777 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.