The graph and table below give information about water use
worldwide and water consumption in two different countries
The line graph gives information regarding global water consumption in agriculture, industry, and domestic purposes in the 20th century. The table compares the populations, areas of irrigated land, and water use per capita in Brazil and Congo.
Overall, it is clear that water demand for these three sectors has increased over time and agriculture accounted for the largest proportion of water use. The water consumption in the two countries recorded appeared to reflect the pattern of their irrigated lands.
The agricultural sector seemed to employ the highest amount of water during the last hundred years, with stable rising demand from around 500 km3 in 1900 to almost six times higher in 2000. Industrial ranked second in water consumption, followed by domestic use with only around one-fifth amount of agriculture's need. These sectors also appeared to share a resemblance trend in water use in the early half of the period. However, after the 1950s, there was a marked rise in water demand for the industrial sector, going from just around 200 km3 in 1950 to over 1300 km3 in 2000. Although the water consumption for domestic purposes rose slightly steeply in the last half-century, this sector still needed the least amount of water, with the figure was almost 300km3 at the period end.
With 176 million citizens in 2000, each Brazillian was recorded consuming 359 m3 of water whereas, in Congo, every citizen only used 8 m3 this year. That may be explained by the fact that Brazil had 265 times more irrigated land than Congo.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, regarding, second, so, still, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1288.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 255.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05098039216 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54522794919 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 106.607317073 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592156862745 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7310802292 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.090909091 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263058675285 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112236401562 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789753620133 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178061710688 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0944734486533 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.