The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The following graph shows the trend of water consumption throughout the world in three distinctive sections, with the table depicting the amount of water which was consumed by Brazil and Democratic Republic of Congo in the year of 2000.
As can be clearly observed from the graph, there are three sectors including agriculture, industrial, and domestic use. Unlike the fact that water consumption in both industry and households initiated slightly above 0 km3 in 1900 and followed fairly similar pattern till 1940, industrial use increased far more drastic than domestic use, more than 1000 km3 and around 300 km3 in 2000, respectively. At the same period, whereas agriculture witnessed a gradual climb from 500 km3 in 1900 to about 1000 km3 in 1940, its consumption skyrocketed and reached 3000 km3 in 2000.
Turning to the table, the population of Brazil was equivalent to 176 million and its land which could be irrigated, was 26500 km2. So, each Brazilian person consumed 359 m3 water in average in 2000. These figures with respect to Congo were 5.2 million people, 100 km2 of land, and 8 m2 water consumption per person, at the same year.
Overall, it is clear from the graph than most of water was consumed in farming around the glob in the 20th century, followed by industrial usage and domestic use.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, whereas, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1066.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82352941176 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57292245839 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552036199095 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 221.0 22.4926829268 983% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1066.0 112.824112599 945% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 221.0 22.9334400587 964% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 28.0 5.23603664747 535% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150544623519 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150544623519 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101983156001 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269226213592 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 111.8 13.2329268293 845% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -135.92 61.2550243902 -222% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 87.1 10.3012195122 846% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.16 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 17.88 8.06136585366 222% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 55.0 11.4329268293 481% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 90.4 10.9970731707 822% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.