The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given graph and table illustrate about the water use in the globe by three sectors and two countries.
Overall, it can be seen that the consumption of water soared in all Agriculture, Domestic and Industrial areas. Another striking feature is that Demographic Republic of Congo used less water than Brazil.
In terms of Agriculture, the use of water stood at about 500km2 in 1900, from where its (water) requirement surged steadily to approximately 1200km2 in 1950. Following this year, there was a sharp swell in the demand, rocketing to 3000Km2 in 2000, which was the highest total of the term. In contrast, Industrial and Domestic sectors began at a nearly similar level of between 50km2 and 52km2 respectively. Interestingly, both of them remained stable for the first half of the period (1950). Despite being unaltered for a decade, Industrial use then witnessed a rapid growth to just over 1200km2 in 2000, whereas there was a steady rise in the water need for the Domestic purpose to finish the span at 400km2. Surprisingly, the Domestic usage of water was the least figure in the beginning and end of the span.
When it comes to the table, Congo was nowhere near as close as Brazil in the entire three categories like population (5.2 million vs 176 million), irrigated land (100km2 vs 26500km2) and per person (8m3 vs 359m3) correspondingly.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 10
No. of Words: 228 200
No. of Characters: 1089 1000
No. of Different Words: 139 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.886 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.776 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.637 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 68 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 50 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 33 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 23 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.8 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.623 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.3 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.376 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.62 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.068 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 808, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e in the beginning and end of the span. When it comes to the table, Congo was no...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, then, well, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1129.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95175438596 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74645116435 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618421052632 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5677411698 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.9 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173749423275 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765031274591 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885236466814 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130353493073 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103351288196 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.