The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The linear charts and table demonstrate how much water(Km3) has been consumed in each sector in the whole 20th century, as well as the figures comparison for population, irrigated area and water consumption per capita in two particular countries in 2000.
It is clear that all of the data in the Democratic Republic of Congo(DRC) was much lower than that in Brazil. Overall, aggregate water consumption increased throughout the whole period.
In the line chart, compared with the water use in manufactories and household, human consumed the most proportion of the water to irrigate the crops and plants in the initial time in the last century. In detail, the numbers of industrial and domestic water use began to grow clearly in the 1950s and 1960s. In the final year shown on the table, the agriculture water consumption took the lead position(about 3000 Km3), following by industrial use(some around 1000) and domestic use (less than 300Km3)
In the table, Brazilian spent 265 times water than DRC on the irrigation, because there are more people lived in 2000. At the meantime, it is noteworthy that the capita figure for Brazil was several dozens of times than that for DRC.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'figures'' or 'figure's'?
Suggestion: figures'; figure's
... the whole 20th century, as well as the figures comparison for population, irrigated ar...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 18, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ar countries in 2000. It is clear that all of the data in the Democratic Republic of Cong...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 307, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...to grow clearly in the 1950s and 1960s. In the final year shown on the table, the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95939086294 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64929883226 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598984771574 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.6083229049 43.030603864 190% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.571428571 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1428571429 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167785833554 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770356195109 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04944293353 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0945904045643 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461160512304 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.