some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss and give opinion
Nowadays, information transmitting and sharing have been becoming more easily due to the development of a bench of modern network technologies. some people, thus, concern about the consequences of the data sharing freely, while they appeal that such information sharing ought to be prohibited. In my opinion, the downside of the core information, such as data associating with scientific research, business and academic world, spreading without any regulation outweighs its benefit.
First, information sharing among the researchers can promote the development of technology and sciences. Because the researchers, who are working in the same field, can reduce the probabilities to do the repeated experiments (repetition) when they are able to access experimental results, which have obtained by others, and cite it. More than that, the academic world can acquire similar benefits through more flexible information sharing. Thus, such data spreading can lead to a more motivating academic world and higher efficient on the latest technology development.
In spite of this, the drawback of freely information spreading is that profits or interests in the business might be harmed. Apparently, the key secrets are likely to be escaped through massive and unregulated data sharing. That causes the loss of comparative advantage, which is owned by some corporations, even to lose much market share.
In conclusion, the advantage of such data sharing is not neglected, which can encourage more sufficient development of science and hi-tech and academic education. However, too freely information sharing might damage the enterprises’ profit. Thus, the procedure of the data transmission should be monitored by the data owners.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...a bench of modern network technologies. some people, thus, concern about the consequ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 214, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'experiments'' or 'experiment's'?
Suggestion: experiments'; experiment's
...ce the probabilities to do the repeated experiments repetition when they are able to access...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, however, if, so, thus, while, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67181467181 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12977174037 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583011583012 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.070352333 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9230769231 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272011840988 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0981475369201 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644832871426 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169255994586 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566825061361 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.