Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, some experts’ income in diverse fields, especially in the athlete world, gets a lot of public attention, because of their higher average income. Some people question that their higher income might be associated with the issue of income unfair and discrimination. In my opinion, such income, which is legal, matches their contribution which has been done.
There are two main reasons why their high salary is reasonable to be granted. First, their income is a recognition of their talent and the achievement which they reward. Because, apparently, there are a few people who have special skills in some specific fields; in contrast, others, that are not gifted, are able to acquire such achievement. Thus, their income is one of the prove on some unique things associated with them, while such salary is reasonable.
In addition, the contribution, which they have been doing for the countries, is the causation of their higher revenue. For example, the athlete won a champion in the Olympic games, the person might be the honour for the whole of the country. Thus, that could improve the domestic cohesion inside the country, and even promote the rise in people’s motivation. By comparison, such contribution ought not to be simulated by other people who have a low salary.
In conclusion, these sports experts have sufficient justification that they should be paid high enough wage, in that the contribution and their achievement has been being made and betoken by these athletes. In my view, their income is reasonable based on what they do.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 372, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...hievement. Thus, their income is one of the prove on some unique things associated with t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ete won a champion in the Olympic games, the person might be the honour for the w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, if, so, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, in my opinion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1311.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14117647059 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80508682766 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545098039216 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4296791125 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.846153846 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6153846154 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53846153846 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0908829305928 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0360568429714 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0332607124511 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0591569433256 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00664726528959 0.056905535591 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.