many governmet
Nowadays, the economic development has been considered as the main goal for government in some countries, while some people claim that the authorities do not ought to do so because there are more significant fields, which need to be focused by governments. In my opinion, they should concentrate on the economy although the development of multi-fields in countries is remarkable vital.
On the one hand, economic development has more priority than any other fields. Because all the other development derives from economic development. To some extent, money means everything for people. While a better economic situation leads to a better living standard, which is meaning people have more disposable income. Thus, citizens demand might be satisfied, and even obtain high satisfaction to the local government as well as the country.
In addition, the benefits of such development might induce that a verity of issues, which is associated with many aspects in society, might be solved or eased. For example, apparently, unemployment indeed is eased, since more job vacancies or opportunities might be created during the economic boom. Thus, better economic development might be the main key to some serious social problems.
In spite of this, the drawback of such government strategy is that unequal development of a society. Because, compared with other countries which contain similar importance on the diverse fields, such countries leak the development potential. Thus, the importance of synchronous development in other fields should not be ignored.
In conclusion, the economic development indeed is the core goal for governments, because of a bunch of benefits brought by it, whereas the downside of it only exists clearly. In my view, the duty of government is to assess the significance of each aspect and field, while to adjust their investment in different fields.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 79, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...as more priority than any other fields. Because all the other development derives from ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 274, Rule ID: NON_ACTION_CONTINUOUS[3]
Message: The verb mean is usually not used with a continuous form, use the simple form instead. Suggestion: 'means'
Suggestion: means
...eads to a better living standard, which is meaning people have more disposable income. Thu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 274, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...eads to a better living standard, which is meaning people have more disposable income. Thu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, if, so, thus, well, whereas, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, in my view, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38775510204 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9828206033 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544217687075 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0790745181 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.6 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0175964835097 0.244688304435 7% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0062263584275 0.084324248473 7% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.023296900003 0.0667982634062 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00982490610561 0.151304729494 6% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0196498122112 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.