the graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevent
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:"Cambria","serif"">The graph illustrates some information about global water usage in three different
sectors during a century, and the table chart compares some matters about water
consumption between Brazil and Congo in 2000.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:"Cambria","serif"">As the graph shows, the most amount of water all over the world was used in the agricultural
sector. It was about 500 km<sup>2 </sup>in 1990 then surged significantly to more
than 3000 km<sup>2</sup> in 2000. According to the table chart, in both Brazil and
Congo the most amount of water supply was used for irrigating land rather than
consuming by per person, and it was more dramatic in Brazil. Dedicated water
for industrial and domestic sectors in all over the world was negligible until
1950 then in both sectors a slight increase was accrued, and they reached to the
approximately 1000 km<sup>2</sup> and 500 km<sup>2</sup> respectively.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:"Cambria","serif"">Overall, the agricultural sector received by far the most amount of water all over the
world. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , "
...le='font-family:"Cambria","serif"'>The graph illustrates...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 185, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , "
...le='font-family:"Cambria","serif"'>As the graph shows, t...
^^^^^^
Line 10, column 199, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , "
...le='font-family:"Cambria","serif"'>Overall, the agricult...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1291.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 7.92024539877 4.92477711251 161% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 11.2024506279 2.65546596893 422% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552147239264 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 334.8 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.1 1.45097560976 145% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 22.4926829268 178% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 210.201540194 43.030603864 488% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 322.75 112.824112599 286% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 40.75 22.9334400587 178% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 11.0 3.83414634146 287% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0903564712798 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574821393479 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333693358132 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0466822529117 0.15604864568 30% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432947021972 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 36.2 13.2329268293 274% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -11.42 61.2550243902 -19% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.51609756098 224% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 24.8 10.3012195122 241% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 29.54 11.4140731707 259% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 11.4329268293 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.9970731707 164% => OK
text_standard: 30.0 11.0658536585 271% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.