The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in the three major cities.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph and tabular representation highlights the information about three places and there monthly temperatures and the hours of sunshine per year. It is clear and coherent represention.
Overall, it is evident that, most of the sunshine per year is taken by people of newyork city whereas, Newyork reached the height temperature in both the seasons of winter and summers.
To begin with, it is seen that, in london temperature is fluctuating in different months. Similarly, from January to march it is winter weather while, from april there is a rapid incline and, weather conversion into hot temperature between 15° to 30° celsius until july. Then, there is a drop from the month September to December from 30° to 5° celsius and, turned the weather cooler. Moreover, London is having least number of sunshine per year. In addition to this, Sydney is the only city which is having normal temperature between 15° to 25° celsius from month january to December but also, sydney is second place to have sunlight in annual hours per year.
Probing ahead, it is spoted that, new york is the city having cold weather from January to March and, the temperature is between 5° to 9° celsius. After that, there is a boom in temperature from cold to hot and touched peek point of 30° celsius from April to July. Further more, there is a constant decline ib temperature from August to September.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 406, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'having the least'.
Suggestion: having the least
...the weather cooler. Moreover, London is having least number of sunshine per year. In additio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, second, similarly, so, then, whereas, while, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1178.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92887029289 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56544390402 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493723849372 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 350.1 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5271615611 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.090909091 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7272727273 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72727272727 5.23603664747 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152268117123 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707410460828 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788204441068 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11945937204 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0773316390289 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.