The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.

The line chart illustrates the mean montly temperatures in three main cities, while the table provides information about how many hours annualy the sun was shinning there.
With regard to average temperatures graph, the peak was fixed in New York in july, when the mean value was about 30 Celsius degrees. Conversely, in Sydney this month was the coldest with the average temperature slightly higher than 15 C. For citizens of either London or New York, the month with the lowest mean temperature was january with values 9 C and 5 C respectively.
The sun was shining for New York and Sydney almost equal number of hours, 2535 and 2473 total annual hours accordingly. London, in turn, received considerably lower amount of sun light, only 1 180 hours per year.
Overall, London and New York have similar duration of warm and cold seasons with slight differences in exact average monthly temperatures. The sun's activity in London was more than two times lower than either in Sydney or New York.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 143, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'suns'' or 'sun's'?
Suggestion: suns'; sun's
...exact average monthly temperatures. The suns activity in London was more than two ti...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, conversely, if, so, while, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 828.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89940828402 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56728371926 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621301775148 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.131839865 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.5 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165391902053 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793589768692 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469196390098 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104524537975 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424278035996 0.0819641961636 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.