The tables given provide comparison of revenues from realization of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in five European countries in 1999 and 2014.
Overall, the market for analyzed goods showed considerable increase in 2004 as compared to 1999. However, Sweden and Denmark showed decline in bananas consumption in 2004.
With regard to coffee sales, the highest amount of that product in money value were sold in Switzerland in 1999 with 3 millions of euros revenue. Nevertheless, in 2004 the situation changed dramatically, the market of UK, with two times lower realization rate than in Switzerland in 1999, experienced more than ten times growth and became the leader of labelled coffee consumption with sales of 20 millions.
In terms of bananas consumption, the leader was Switzerland, where in both years citizens consumed more Fairtrade-labelled bananas than people, who live in other four countries all together. Conversely, the outsiders were Sweden and Denmark, where in sum for two years were sold almost equal amount of bananas for 2.8 and 2.9 millions of euros respectfully.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '3 million'.
Suggestion: 3 million
...e were sold in Switzerland in 1999 with 3 millions of euros revenue. Nevertheless, in 2004 th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... consumption with sales of 20 millions. In terms of bananas consumption, the lea...
^^^
Line 4, column 325, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '9 million'.
Suggestion: 9 million
...t equal amount of bananas for 2.8 and 2.9 millions of euros respectfully.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, however, nevertheless, so, as for, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41520467836 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12113103064 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584795321637 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0059073201 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.285714286 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279724977759 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131866747538 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112599751566 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186317639004 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12009193215 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.