The graph below compares figures for production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000.It also predicts the figures of 2050.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 50, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...quick glance on the illustration in 1950 was shot up energy units thermal units ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the illustration in 1950 was shot up energy units thermal units imports.There...
^^
Line 3, column 103, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
... up energy units thermal units imports.Therefore, in 1975 was US comsumption plummet to ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Hence
...rotion energy units thermal units in 75.Hence, there was reduced to increased in 1975...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 16, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
... 1975 US comsumption. To trigger with,in 1950 US production was similar ratio in...
^^^
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
... ratio in the chart in 25 thermal units.But also,in 1975 to 2000was climbed day by ...
^^^
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...n the chart in 25 thermal units.But also,in 1975 to 2000was climbed day by day ene...
^^^
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...so,in 1975 to 2000was climbed day by day energy units. As well as, in 2025 may be...
^^
Line 7, column 63, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
... same energy units in imports. As far as,in 1975 US comsumption declined day by day...
^^^
Line 7, column 112, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...US comsumption declined day by day. Then,in 2025 would be projection upsurge propor...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, may, so, then, therefore, well, as well as, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 739.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92666666667 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89766956171 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546666666667 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 212.4 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 69.4621074759 43.030603864 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.375 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220936558291 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116398378892 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146294207657 0.0843802449381 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19329996031 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.174659852666 0.0819641961636 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.