The graph below compares figures for production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000.It also predicts the figures of 2050.
The liner chart reveals that information of represention compares figures for production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2050.
Moving a quick glance on the illustration in 1950 was shot up energy units thermal units imports.Therefore, in 1975 was US comsumption plummet to upsurge proprotion energy units thermal units in 75.Hence, there was reduced to increased in 1975 US comsumption.
To trigger with,in 1950 US production was similar ratio in the chart in 25 thermal units.But also,in 1975 to 2000was climbed day by day energy units. As well as, in 2025 may be rise in same way energy units thermal units in 65. Last, in 2050 projections increase day by day.
To sum up, in 1950 was same energy units in imports. As far as,in 1975 US comsumption declined day by day. Then,in 2025 would be projection upsurge proportion in energy units in 140 thermial units.
- Some people believe law changes human behavior. Do you agree/disagree? 77
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy.The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include an 73
- Some people argue that governments should spend money only on medicines and education and that the things like threatres and sports stadiums are luxurious Agree and disagree 84
- The table below shows the sales at a departmental store Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 83
- Many government think that economic progress is their most important goal.some people,however,think that other types of progress are equally important for a country.Discuss both these veiws and give own opinion? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 50, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...quick glance on the illustration in 1950 was shot up energy units thermal units ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the illustration in 1950 was shot up energy units thermal units imports.There...
^^
Line 3, column 103, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
... up energy units thermal units imports.Therefore, in 1975 was US comsumption plummet to ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Hence
...rotion energy units thermal units in 75.Hence, there was reduced to increased in 1975...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 16, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
... 1975 US comsumption. To trigger with,in 1950 US production was similar ratio in...
^^^
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
... ratio in the chart in 25 thermal units.But also,in 1975 to 2000was climbed day by ...
^^^
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...n the chart in 25 thermal units.But also,in 1975 to 2000was climbed day by day ene...
^^^
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...so,in 1975 to 2000was climbed day by day energy units. As well as, in 2025 may be...
^^
Line 7, column 63, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
... same energy units in imports. As far as,in 1975 US comsumption declined day by day...
^^^
Line 7, column 112, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...US comsumption declined day by day. Then,in 2025 would be projection upsurge propor...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, may, so, then, therefore, well, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 739.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92666666667 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89766956171 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546666666667 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 212.4 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 69.4621074759 43.030603864 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.375 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220936558291 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116398378892 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146294207657 0.0843802449381 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19329996031 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.174659852666 0.0819641961636 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.