The graph below compares the number of visits to two new music sites on the web Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below You should write at least 150 words

Essay topics:

The graph below compares the number of visits to two new music sites on the web. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. You should write at least 150 words.

The chart demonstrates the number of explorer of two new sites related to music measured in thousands in the period of 15 days.

It is true that besides the twelve day and the following one pop parade website has had more visitors than the music choice.

The red line chart, which was related to pop parade, started with 120000 visitors and in contrast music choice website had 40000 visitors at its first day. Pop parade rate declined almost same as music choice which fluctuated until the eleven day but then it had the lowest numbers of visitors in both second and fourth day with 20000 followers.

Then, pop parade hit the lowest numbers in day 7 with near 40000 visitors meanwhile for music choice it rose dramatically, too. In music choice chart after dipping it ended to hit a peak in day 14 with more than 120000 visitors. In the last days they reached the opposite numbers. Pop parade soared and then hit a peak in the last day with more than 160000 visitors. Whereas music choice website visitors fell in the last day to less than 80000 visitors.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 368, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ast day with more than 160000 visitors. Whereas music choice website visitors fell in t...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, second, so, then, whereas, while, in contrast, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 879.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65079365079 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20165590175 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6420739162 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6666666667 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0733393347729 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0404072072169 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410493796428 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0633337677721 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461335721945 0.0819641961636 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.93 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.