The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates numerical data of a report in 2008 about American energy consumption since 1980 with prospective plans until 2030. Overall, petrol and oil increased dramatically and so did the coal which are going to go up steadily, whereas the other ones: natural gas, nuclear, solar/wind and hydropower energy fluctuated and are going to remain unchanged as planned.
As it can be seen, petrol and oil were at the lowest point in 1985 (a little higher than 30%) and from then it began to go up remarkably proved by reaching a peak at a little lower than 45% in 2020 and intentionally increase to the highest: 50%. Similarly, the coal’s energy consumption in 2020 was 10% higher than it was in the year 1980. Besides, it is going to go upward in the future to nearly 31%. In contrast, the usage of natural gas went upward and downward a lot which demonstrated by a rise between 1990 to 2010 but it will be stable as it was in 2015 till now. The hydropower tended to rise and fall slightly: 4% in 2005 to 2% in 2015 and aim to remain unchanged. However, nuclear and solar/ wind power’s using were at 4% in 1980 and increase more and more in the previous years as well as it will perform so in the next few years although there were some trivial falls during the growth.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, similarly, so, then, well, whereas, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1051.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47234042553 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53341989956 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578723404255 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.9426834455 43.030603864 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.375 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.375 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 5.23603664747 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114661006593 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593231612548 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1121979459 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115855884474 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795581204628 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.24 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.