The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of enery in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart illustrates how much energy has been consumed since 1980 in the USA, categorised in different sources of fuel, and the future estimations by 2030.
Overall, energy consumptions by fossil fuels have had a tendency to be upward while the amounts of power consumed by using renewable sources of energy have witnessed a steady trend. It is also worth pointing out that petrol and oil have been the most dominant type of fuel, in terms of consuming energy.
To begin with, in 1980, the amount of energy consumed by using petrol and oil stood at about 35 quadrillion units. Despite a mild fluctuation in the next 15 years, this figure have experienced a significant rise since then and is expected to reach nearly 50 quadrillion units by 2030, remaining the highest number among all fuels. Also, it is reported that the energy consumption of natural gas was only around 20 quadrillion units, which was higher than the figure for coal by 5 quadrillion units initially. Up to now, natural gas indicator has shown a noticeable fluctuation, reaching approximately 23 quadrillion units whereas the figure for coal has increased steeply, surpassing its gas counterparts and becoming the second-highest number. It is projected that by 2030, both quantites of energy consumed by coal and natural gas will have continued with its current trends.
Turning to the other set of data, within the first decade of the period, energy consumed by nuclear, solar/wind and hydropower was all recorded at roughly 5 quadrillion units. Until now, meanwhile both indicators of nuclear and solar wind have risen slightly before flattening out, the figure for hydropower has dropped illegibly to just about 3 quadrillion units. Furthermore, in the future, the energy consumptions of these 3 fuels are predicted to stabilised.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, second, so, then, whereas, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 965.302439024 158% => OK
No of words: 296.0 196.424390244 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14527027027 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86624894855 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 106.607317073 159% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570945945946 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 283.868780488 165% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1893430813 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.454545455 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9090909091 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0873542887196 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0388512885052 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0315071588201 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0557557116893 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032991510299 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 40.7170731707 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.