The graph compares energy consumption from various sources in USA from 1980 to 2030. Looking more closely to the table, it can be seen that there are fluctuating trends is observed by each type of fuel.
According to the figure, Petrol and Oil consumes at the highest level among other fuel types. The trends had fluctuated during 1980 and 1995 at around 35 quadrillion units. Today, the consumption reaches at 40 quadrillion units, and it will be growth 50 quadrillion units in 2030. Another group consists of Coal and Natural Gas, these fuels maintained a middle position. The trend has a considerable similarity until 2015 to 2030. The figure for Coal will overtake Natural Gas’s from 2015 onwards. Nuclear, Solar/Wind and Hydropower had the same energy usage in 1980 at about 4 quadrillion units. By 2030, the consumption of Nuclear will overtake the rest.
In conclusion, Petrol and Oil will be the most used energy, where as Nuclear, Solar/Wind and Hydro will be used the least in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...l and Oil will be the most used energy, where as Nuclear, Solar/Wind and Hydro will be u...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 843.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98816568047 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6481521178 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.7054440627 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.6363636364 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3636363636 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.09090909091 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129011308488 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583993171734 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744611735823 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0924982311783 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609443820769 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.07 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.