The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.

The given line graph shows how energy is consumed in the United States since 1980 with expected consumption until 2030.

Overall, it is obvious that the figure for Petrol and Oil has increased gradually and it is expected to grow considerably until 2030.

Looking into more details, energy used in Petrol and Oil has a moderate increase of nearly 15 units of consumption during the whole period. Moreover, this figure remains to be the highest among the other uses. Surprisingly, the consumption of Coal and Natural Gas fluctuated until 2015 at about 22 units, and the projections expect that the former energy will rise remarkably from 22 to 30 units while the latest will level off until 2030.

In contrast, the report shows that Nuclear, Solar/Wind and Hydropower in 1980 stood at 4 units of consumption, making them the less use energy. After a decade, the figure for them somehow grew in variety degrees. It is clear that the consumption of Nuclear slightly climbed above 5 units afterward, while the figure for Solar/Wind seems to become stable during 50 years. At least, Hydropower will be the lowest consumption of energy with approximately 3 units.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, moreover, so, while, at least, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02577319588 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65798008167 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592783505155 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2487507183 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.333333333 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189976157415 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745866032193 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687078414728 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123744778782 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632980771639 0.0819641961636 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.