The given bar charts illustrate destination of UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not have a full-time job after they left school in 2008.
Overall, it is clear that most graduate and postgraduate students had further study after they graduated. By contrast, the figures for voluntary work were relatively low.
Looking into more details, except for people who worked part-time, the number of graduate students was ten times postgraduate students. Approximately 30,000 students who had a college diploma were going to study further. Master students follow the same pattern, 2725 of them had further education to get their doctor degree. Surprisingly, the figure for unemployment in graduate and postgraduate halved further education, at roughly 16000 and 1600 respectively.
Moreover, 17735 graduate students had part-time job, making it the second highest among other works. The number of master students who had part-time job was large too, at 2535 which is almost equal to the figure for further study. Voluntary work remain the lowest destination students went, only 3500 graduate students and 345 master student chose to go.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 49, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'jobbed'.
Suggestion: jobbed
..., 17735 graduate students had part-time job, making it the second highest among oth...
^^^
Line 7, column 150, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'jobbed'.
Suggestion: jobbed
...er of master students who had part-time job was large too, at 2535 which is almost ...
^^^
Line 7, column 335, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'student' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'students'.
Suggestion: students
...y 3500 graduate students and 345 master student chose to go.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, moreover, second, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.48453608247 80% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 5.05154639175 99% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.03092783505 198% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 32.9175257732 21% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 26.3917525773 68% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.85567010309 130% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 937.175257732 104% => OK
No of words: 177.0 206.0 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49717514124 4.54256449028 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.78020617076 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76720833814 2.54303337028 109% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 127.690721649 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.627118644068 0.622605031667 101% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 290.88556701 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6804123711 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 16.3608247423 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.97919134 44.8134815571 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.3 76.5299724578 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7 16.8248392259 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 4.34317383033 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273221370515 0.216113520407 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115691623884 0.0766984524023 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830234378457 0.0603063233224 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189465506052 0.12726935374 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0775200120495 0.0580467560999 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 8.37731958763 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 70.7449484536 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 7.45979381443 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 8.71597938144 164% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 7.59969072165 102% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 41.2886597938 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 8.62886597938 99% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 8.54432989691 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.