The given maps show a small town named Islip and the planned development of this town.
Looking into more details, it is obvious that the town planner is minimizing the size of park in order to increase the number of accommodation. Besides, the row of shops on the north part of Islip rebuild into a bus station, a shopping center and a car park. It will be a great progress on the basis that Islip do not have a public transportation now.
There is one significant change in Islip town, the Main road which is dangerous for people to walk will reconstruct into a pedestrian path so that residents can go shopping in a more safety environment. Moreover, there is only one road can connect the west and the east of Islip now, it will be changed to a round dual carriageway and people lives in the town can reach around more easier.
Overall, it is clear that the main purposes of the development is to increase the houses and provide a pleasant shopping condition for people.
The diagrams illustrate some
The diagrams illustrate some proposed changes to the central area of the town of Islip.
It is clear that the principal change to the town will be the construction of a ring road around the centre. Various other developments with regard to shops and housing will accompany the building of this road.
Looking at the map of Islip as it is now, we can see that a main road runs through its centre from east to west. The second map shows the planned pedestrianisation of this road. Traffic will be diverted on to a dual carriageway that will form a ring around the town centre.
Currently there is a row of shops along either side of the main road. However, it appears that the shops along the north side of the new pedestrian street will be demolished to make way for a bus station, shopping centre, car park and new housing area. The shops along the south side of the street will remain, but it seems that the town’s park will be reduced in size so that more new houses can be built within the ring road.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'great progress'.
Suggestion: great progress
...pping center and a car park. It will be a great progress on the basis that Islip do not have a p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 378, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...ople lives in the town can reach around more easier. Overall, it is clear that the main ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, look, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 809.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57062146893 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63852090921 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564971751412 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1215222461 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.571428571 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17646304369 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879136803131 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775457033131 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123817801869 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0858142619685 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.