People have different views on whether it is necessary for governments to make a law in order to promote residents to recycle. I firmly believe that it is important to create a legal requirement which can force people to deal with their home waste.
On the one hand, with the increases of the environmental issues, people start to care about the world which they live in. Recycling is one of the measurements that can reduce the wastage. For example, useless paper can be recycled and be produced again into tissues, so that the number of trees will not be cut down. However, some residents are too lazy to recycle their waste, throwing away is the most convenient way for them. Unfortunately, if the governments do not take any actions, the pollution such as C02 emission and green house gas will be more severe in the future.
On the other hand, governments can make effort on building a law and therefore people may shun to receive the fine and start recycling. For instance, it is useful to ban people to deal with their wastage badly. If they break the rule, they must be given some punishments like doing volunteer work, so that they will not do it again. In addition, creating a law for recycling is able to make citizens aware of the environmental problems. The problems can be detrimental because all human beings are living on the earth, and the waste from home can be harmful. To be specific, recycling is the easiest way for citizens to do which can save the earth, so the governments need to draft a legal requirement immediately.
In conclusion, recycling by oneself is not enough for reducing the pollution. It is clear to me that laws are needed in order to increase the number of recycling.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68543046358 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68247279167 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526490066225 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.0606131078 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.3333333333 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34023132539 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113287098229 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398873907603 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208893434196 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496078572907 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.