With the life expectancy becoming longer than before, human are highly concerned about the health care. People have different views on whether the sport facilities are useful for residents to improve their health. It is clear to me that physical amenities are not enough for people to increase the condition of their health problem.
On the one hand, doing exercise is one of the helpful way to keep people healthy and thus everyone needs to do some physical activities in order to have a stronger body. For example, some elderly tend to walk after their meals so that they will not suffer from stomach overload. Besides, children who exercise regularly are less obese and the density of their bones will be higher than other peers who do not exercise. However, it is possible for people to get injured on the playground while they are having some physical exercise. Especially the old people who break his or her bodies may cause some side effect afterward.
One the other hand, it seems to me that constructing a number of sport facilities do not necessarily have a huge effect of improving public health. Other solutions such as weight controlled and the development of health insurance are necessary and need to take a part in too. For instance, people who have cancer cannot be healed if they only do regular exercise, they need to spend a large amount of money to be hospitalized. Therefore, the health insurance is the best measurement which can support their expense to reach a helpful doctor. Moreover, people who suffer from obesity not only need the extra exercise but also require a weight controlled plan. It will be a more efficient solution to improve their health conditions.
In conclusion, physical activities can only improve a part of public health, I believe that there are still some measurements that governments can do in order to create a more pleasant condition for human’s health.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1599.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95046439628 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62021951874 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.101156709 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.6 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5333333333 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248321075874 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919311330585 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065644838406 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161980166805 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347533170853 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.