The graph below gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030.
The line graph includes information from Annual energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy, which is genereted from six different sources, in the us over a 32-year period from 1980 to 2012 and projected consumption until 2030. The units are measured in Quadrillion.
Overall, it is clear that most of American’s energy needs have been met by fossil fuels and predictions were done by this Institute show that this trend will continue in future.
In 1980, oil consumption in the us stood at 35q while coal and natural gas consumed were about 17q and 20q respectively. Despite some fluctuation in the amount of oil consumption, consumption of this source has risen by 5q. A rising of 10q is predicted for this source until 2030. while two other fossil fuels experienced fluctued trend, consumption of those rose gradually, reaching the same point (roughly 25q). it is anticipated that consumption of energy which is derived from natural gas remains this level whereas coal consumption will rise by nearly 5q.
At the beginning of the period, energy from Nuclear, Solar and Hydropower consumed about 4q. A gradual increase was seen in the atomic energy, with figure reaching 8q in 2012. In the future, consumption of this source will be risen by 1q. An insignificant decrease had been occurred in consumption of energy which was provided from sustainable source, before this figure had fallen back to 1980 figure. Now consumption of clean energy source stand under 5q, and it is projected that consumption of those source remain under 7q in 2030.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...units are measured in Quadrillion. Overall, it is clear that most of Americ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 173, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...tute show that this trend will continue in future. In 1980, oil consumption i...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...his trend will continue in future. In 1980, oil consumption in the us stood...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 282, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...s predicted for this source until 2030. while two other fossil fuels experienced fluc...
^^^^^
Line 17, column 354, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this rose' or 'those rises', 'those roses'?
Suggestion: this rose; those rises; those roses
...erienced fluctued trend, consumption of those rose gradually, reaching the same point roug...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 413, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...y, reaching the same point roughly 25q. it is anticipated that consumption of ener...
^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onsumption will rise by nearly 5q. At the beginning of the period, energy f...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 18.0 5.60731707317 321% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1328.0 965.302439024 138% => OK
No of words: 257.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1673151751 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79160033773 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556420233463 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.3491916826 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.153846154 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7692307692 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.15384615385 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339887597478 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109077896046 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115402549588 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21855362531 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144190671609 0.0819641961636 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.