The graph below gives information from annual energy outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030.
The given line graph reveals what quadrillion units of USA energy consumption by fuel from 1980 to present time and the future projection upto 2030 as well.
A quick look at the line graph is quite enough to make it clear that the energy utilisation through six different fuels was growing and likely to go in upward direction until the one third of 21 century.
In the analisation of energy usage in USA, petrol and oil stood at first position with 35 quadrillion units which are soared exponentially upto 43 quadrillion units in present time and will be reached at 49 quadrillion units in 2030. However, in case of natural gas and coal initial energy values were only 20 and 10 quadrillion units consecutively that were moving towards sky together and approached the analogous point (25 quadrillion units) in 2015 but this value will remain stable for natural gas and supposed to be soared by 6 quadrillion units for coal in 2030.
Moving further, in case of nuclear, solar and hydropower, energy consumption trend was almost similar in 1980 and will be very close to one another in 2030. nalogous amount of energy ( 3 quadrillion units) was seen in these three fuels over the period of first five years (from 1980 to 1985). After that energy utilisation started climbing marginally in nuclear, solar and hydropower though predicted that will be still under 10 quadrillion units in 2030.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centuries'.
Suggestion: centuries
...ard direction until the one third of 21 century. In the analisation of energy usage...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 3, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...until the one third of 21 century. In the analisation of energy usage in USA, ...
^^
Line 7, column 158, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Nalogous
...l be very close to one another in 2030. nalogous amount of energy 3 quadrillion units w...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...other in 2030. nalogous amount of energy 3 quadrillion units was seen in these th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, so, still, third, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1152.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86075949367 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63420935225 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561181434599 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.1891337997 43.030603864 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.571428571 112.824112599 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.8571428571 22.9334400587 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211810942473 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123265133941 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729928167044 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159130514005 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0827485276688 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.2329268293 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.