The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 to 2000
The given illustration provides how much electricity that were from coal, natural, petroleum supply for New York city from 1980 to 2000.
It is clear that the amount of electricity produced from petroleum was highest in the city of New York over the period of 20 years.
There was a fluctuation in the figure of petroleum that generated electricity between 1980 and 2000, particularly it had increase from the beginning of the period to 1985 then it dropped by about 350kw in 1990. Furthermore, within 10 years from 1990 to 2000, more people tended to use petroleum than in the past, about over 700 kw in 2000. Besides, from 1985 to 2000, the amount of electricity from natural gas went up while the opposite was true for coal, from about 100kw to 500kw and from 300kw to nearly 200kw.
At the beginning of the given period, people showed their preferences to using coal rather than natural gas before the percentage of energy produced from natural gas and coal to provide New York had the same stable in 1900, about over 200kw. In addition to, in the continued period, the amount of natural gas was high in comparison with those of coal, about 500kw and 200kw in 2000.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, so, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 966.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66666666667 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41555555362 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492753623188 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.1780603363 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.0 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5714285714 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328340105947 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174232654678 0.103423049105 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0883036957271 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236791969886 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710261217993 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.4 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.