The graph below shows the amount of goods transported in the UK from 1974 to 2002.
The supplied line graph illustrates the transportation of goods on the behalf of different ways of transportation, over the period of 28 years, from 1974 to 2002.
Overall, it can be seen that the transportation of goods through pipeline was analysed least popular during the span, while roadways were well-renowned on the grounds of transporting goods.
Turning into more detail, the number of goods transported via pipeline experienced a continue increment trend from negligible amount to over 20 million tonnes in between 1974-2002. Between initial year to 1990, the amount of goods, which were transported on the ages of roadways accounted from 70 to 80 million tonnes. After decreasing to almost 78 million tonnes, the data related to transportation of goods via roads rose by about 20 million tonnes eventually.
Moving further, there was a steady fall down in the number of transported goods from 40 to nearby 30 million tonnes until 1986. Then, by following variation, it had been around 37 million tonnes over the rest of span. Ultimately, waterways were noticed with just under 40 million tonnes goods, that were transported to United Kingdom and by increasing throughout the period, it reached at almost 65 million tonnes by 2002.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ds transported via pipeline experienced a continue increment trend from negligible amount ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1050.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22388059701 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92151232693 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592039800995 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0515245745 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.25 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275600071328 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134188111572 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0944218150081 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186986064074 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0865714100626 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.