The government's investment in arts, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead. To what extent do you agree with this statement.
Indeed, the government collects funds from civilians to provide amenities. Investments in arts, music and theatre are a waste of money. Instead of this, authorities should invest this money to give better public service. According to me, public service is a better option.
To commence with, the government must provide basic public facilities to the citizens because they pay tax to the government and it is the whole responsibility of the government to fulfil the needs of the individuals such as transportation and roads. By which people can travel without any external difficulty. Additionally, public service is more important than any other purpose because tax is also used to tackle catastrophes. In case of a global pandemic, that funds can be used to give medical facilities to the victims. For example, in the recent corona pandemic, Newzeland became the first corona-free nation due to the brilliant use of their investments. As a result of this, a nation can tackle difficult situations.
Furthermore, investment in the public museums is very beneficial for the individual because they get to know about their culture, tradition and history if government spend the money on the public by which they can get in touch with their background and it also inspires them. However, the government should invest a low amount of invested funds in arts, theatre and music because it gives rise to talent among the people by which they bring Laurens to the name of belonging nation which leads to the personality of the nation all over the world.
In conclusion, art, theatre and music are important but the government should give first priority to the basic service because it is a public right.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...is money to give better public service. According to me, public service is a better option. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09285714286 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82672197834 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507142857143 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.6756739397 49.4020404114 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.692307692 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363639573322 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132078466064 0.084324248473 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107362677759 0.0667982634062 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255880666367 0.151304729494 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10588550718 0.056905535591 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.