The government's investment in arts, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead.
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
The issue of the state budget redistribution for specific needs has always caused disputes among citizens. In this regard, part of the population designates spendings on arts as wasteful expenses, claiming that development in public utilities should dominate. Although the role of culture should not be denied in a country's heritage, public goods are undoubtedly necessary for everyone.
On the one hand, the government should invest money in the sphere of arts, in fact advanced culture acts as an indicator of multifaceted evolution of substantial structures of a nation. Many countries recognize the possibility of cultural influence on the economic efficiency and development of society. Researches confirmed a direct correlation between the level of government intelligent development and the general level of education, social stability and a low crime level. For instance, at Hamad Airport in economically prosperous city Doha, Qatar, tourists are greeted by a sculpture of a giant yellow bear, purchased by the authorities for $6,8 million. Hence, culture plays a special role as a socially significant industry aimed at the qualitative formation of human potential.
On the other hand, the market economy is unable to satisfy the social requirements of citizens itself, that is why the government is forced to invest currency in public goods. Residents are in daily need of such institutions as the law enforcement, free education, public transport, system of urban roads and other necessities. The relevance of all of the above benefits in human life is undeniable, therefore the state should take care of their supply through rational redistribution of taxes. For example, the most efficient metro in Singapore which envelops the entire city like a web, transports 3,5 million people daily, satisfying their demand for a fast and cheap travel. Thus, a bunch of urgent human needs are the responsibility of the government, since no one else might satisfy the.
To sum it all up, the difficulty of choosing between funding the arts and public goods must be noted. Undoubtedly, culture plays a significant role in the person’s formation, and urgent human needs in social utilities require special attention.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... undoubtedly necessary for everyone. On the one hand, the government should i...
^^^
Line 3, column 650, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...w bear, purchased by the authorities for ,8 million. Hence, culture plays a specia...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tative formation of human potential. On the other hand, the market economy is...
^^^
Line 5, column 349, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...and other necessities. The relevance of all of the above benefits in human life is undenia...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 793, Rule ID: THE_SENT_END[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'the'?
...rnment, since no one else might satisfy the. To sum it all up, the difficulty...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...since no one else might satisfy the. To sum it all up, the difficulty of choo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1880.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41786743516 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04507192392 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587896253602 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7607757584 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 125.333333333 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1333333333 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141831312664 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0447424037069 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563041038581 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0822827215526 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.019237207528 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.