The government's investment in arts, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead.
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Over the years, every government have been doing more and more for people. Although I agree that this is important to spend money on public services, I do not find investing in arts less necessary.
To begin with, disbursing money on public service have some evident reasons such as the fact that people cannot exist without it. Hospitals and schools are the most inalienable part of people’s life due to determining the quality of life that occurs precisely through such concepts. For example, if a country stop spending money on keeping citizens alive, the government will cease to be advanced and will lose many lives. Hence, expanding knowledge and preserving the lives of our people is an obligation that they provide by investing in these institutions.
However, cultural development of people cannot be excluded from this list. In our time, people have become less kind, responsive and intellectually progressive because many people are simply not interested in going to theaters and museums which is why many moral foundations have been lost. Our century has already advanced awfully and no longer possible to satisfy only the lowest needs. Everyone needs to understand that being educated in different areas is a salient point due to being engrossing is an unchallengeable for communication with others. For instance, if the state thinks only about physical needs, everyone will become like robots without strong differences from each other inside. Thus, the government should be a friend to its people and provide an opportunity to love theaters, arts and music.
Taking everything into consideration, financing in public services or entertainment is not mutually exclusive things. To my mind, every country must ensure that the person is healthy and intellectually developed.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, so, thus, for example, for instance, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33802816901 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85094742324 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633802816901 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.041076339 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.285714286 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189167864128 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06293549111 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072723451817 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123090191312 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0830219966739 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.