The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years
The line graph depicts the number of trash manufactured by company A, company B and company C from 2000 to 2015. The units measured in tonnes.
Overall, the number of waste produced by company A showed a downward trend. However, company C experienced a significant rise throughout the period. The company B had some fluctuations.
Firstly, at the starting period, the amount of trash manufactured by company B and company C is around 8 tonnes and 4 tonnes respectively, then both rose to 10 and 6 tonnes in the period of 2005. The company C continuously increased through out the period, in 2010 it exceeded company B and at the end of the period, it reached the highest other than two with around 10 tonnes. Company B after 2005 started plummeting and in 2010 it overlaps with company C with around 7 tonnes. At last, company B reached the bottom position with 3 tonnes.
On the other hand, the company A produced waste of 12 tonnes in 2000 with higher than other company and then significantly declined for the whole period. At some point between 2010 and 2015, Company C took over company A for the peak position. At the last period 2015 company plummeted to 8 tonnes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 234, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...5. The company C continuously increased through out the period, in 2010 it exceeded company...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n with 3 tonnes. On the other hand, the company A produced waste of 12 tonne...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, so, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70673076923 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73245732628 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471153846154 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.2836813292 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.5833333333 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286662167054 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124135752036 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639366651009 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202162921184 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460300365994 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.