The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.
The given line graph provides the number of three companies in term of their waste output during the period between 2000 to 2015.
In general, as can be seen that while the number of waste output of company C rose significantly, the opposite was true for the rest of two companies A and B. Also, the highest number of the waste product was the company C and the lowest was company B during the period.
According to the graph, in 2000, the waste output of company A was the largest number at 12 tonnes, as opposed to 8 tonnes of company B, and compared to 4 tonnes of company C. In the following five years, the waste product of company C and B rose dramatically to 6 tonnes and 10 tonnes respectively, while the rest of the company was the trend decrease by 1 tonne.
However, from 2005 to 2015, three company changed significantly, the amounts of waste output in company C increased rapidly to 11 tonnes from 7 tonnes, while company B and company A decreased considerably, the number of waste product of company B fell rapidly to 3 tonnes, this number dropped stronger than company A by 5 tonnes at the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-24 | Adeola Nafisat | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | shell | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | Evelyn_Han | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-27 | Jerusha Roy Festus | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows the Japan s population by age groups starting in 1960 and including a forecast to 2040 66
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London. 73
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years. 67
- In today's competitive world, many families find it necessary for both parents to go out to work. While some say the children in these families benefit from the additional income, others feel they lack support because of their parents' absence 73
- The table below shows the percentage of students giving good rating for different aspects of a university in China in 2000, 2005, 2010. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45410628019 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61570002583 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.444444444444 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.5893976747 43.030603864 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.666666667 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.5 22.9334400587 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282451109847 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174677372529 0.103423049105 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429391676038 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203267328952 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250871081621 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.89 61.2550243902 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.