The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph captures the data of the waste produced by three companies (Company A, Company B, and Company C) in a span of a decade and a half (15 years). Overall, there is about a 25% decrease in the amount of waste produced by Company A which was the leader of waste creation in 2000, whereas Company C which produced the least amount of waste in 2000 (slightly above 3 tonnes) increased to about 200% in 2015.
Company A was the leading producer of waste in 2000 and created 12 tonnes. During the 15 year period, it saw a steady decline. In 2015, the company hit the lowest point of just below 9 tonnes of waste.
In 2000, Company B produced waste which was significantly above 6 tonnes and slightly below 9 tonnes. This peaked in 2005 when it created waste somewhat above than 9 tonnes. After 2005 there is a steep decline and created the least amount of waste in 2015 (3 tonnes) among all the companies.
Company C saw the exact opposite trend as of Company A. From producing the least amount of waste (just above 3 tonnes) in 2000, to the most in 2015 which was just above 9 tonnes. After 2010, there was a steep increase in waste production for this company. In 2010, Company B and Company C both produced identical amounts of waste, approximately slightly above 6 tonnes.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45106382979 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38826920326 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.425531914894 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.5787971123 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1666666667 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5833333333 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.25 5.23603664747 24% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 1.13902439024 878% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245256205771 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11156801679 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586431334447 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180374742646 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533151799814 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.53 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.