With the increasing population and growing urban centers, many countries are losing their natural beauty places. What benefits are there to protecting places of natural beauty? How can this be solved?
For many countries, tourist attractions are mainly places of natural beauty and a plethora of leisure activities revolve around well-preserved natural resources. As the world’s population grows, a number of places of natural charm are destroyed to compensate for the need for more land for human usage; nevertheless, people should be reminded of how beneficial these natural resources are as well as should be educated on how to help save them.
Case in point, rafting, one of the most popular tourism activities in Thailand, is a seasonal event that is only available with a significant level of water, a condition that requires the conservation of the surrounding natural resources. To further explain, most places of natural beauty feature abundant vegetation and trees, which not only are beautiful but also help purify the air. For instance, according to certain research, in one year, a mature tree can absorb over 48 pounds of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and release oxygen in exchange. There are a few crucial benefits to protecting natural beauties: greenhouse gas reduction and tourist attractions.
Secondly, one of the more prominent causes of the deterioration of natural beauties is tourism activities. Hence, ecotourism presents a feasible solution to protect both the tourism industry’s growth and natural beauty attractions. In order to allow us to harmoniously coexist with nature, there are a few approaches that we can take. For example, an average office worker probably consumes over 200 cups of coffee per year and, if we can replace these cups with reusable containers, it would be great as plastic and Styrofoam cups take ages to decompose, creating excessive wastes that are bad for nature. To put into perspective, incentives, including value-added tax exemption or discounts on lodging expenses, can be offered to tourists who choose to stay at local hotels or homestays that are pro-ecotourism. To illustrate, promoting ecotourism campaigns requires a collaboration of private sectors and government to create policies in parallel with marketing campaigns to encourage ecotourism. Firstly, when observing items used in our daily lives, it is obvious that we can switch from single-use plastic containers and packages to those made from reusable materials.
To conclude, I am of an opinion that there are a number of advantages to preserving the elegance of nature and there are a few approaches, as mentioned above, that may effectively allow us to do so.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2110.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 395.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3417721519 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04094369687 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594936708861 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 675.9 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.9674194583 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.714285714 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2142857143 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287171524276 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0942857827419 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706545747592 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158437947137 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774734521154 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.3 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 78.4519038076 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.