It is commonly believed that nowadays main factors that affect a child's development are media, pop culture and friends. A different point of view is that family plays the most significant role. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is generally argued by some that external factors have several significant impacts on a child’s development; diametrically opposed to this, others propound the idea that the dedicated upbringing of parents plays an important role in children progression. Although both sides may advance equally compelling arguments in support of themselves, I personally incline towards the latter for the rationale that follows.
On the one hand, it is a fact beyond dispute that there are a number of reasons why most of the child’s development is affected by technologies and their peers in the modern era. To begin with, the children are likely to copy the behaviour and catchphrases of their favourite personalities. For instance, more increasing of violent display and colloquial advertising is showed by the uncontrolled proliferation of media platforms, which negatively affects children progression. In addition, the young generation’s can be easily influenced by the digital world, trending fashion and peers. Because of the fast-paced technological innovation, children these days spend their time on the screen. Therefore, the young tend to immerse in different international cultures by the sharing of internet users and friends.
On the other hand, there is no gainsaying that the training of parents is most significant to the development of the young age. The first point is that only parents can teach the children how to talk and behave toward others in accordance with the moral code. A further explanation worth mentioning is that parents are great friends for the pupil. Taking the typical example is that mom and dad can spend their spare time playing video games, do some outdoor activities or brainstorming ideas for homework at school after taking the school hours, which are extremely contributed to foster the family bonding.
To conclude then, whilst there exist contrasting stances on the matter, it is taxing work to determine which may be more positive. Howbeit, in line with the previous discussion, I am convinced to assert that the parents’ guidance is a vital role in the successful development of the pupil.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...edia platforms, which negatively affects children progression. In addition, the y...
^^
Line 3, column 668, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al innovation, children these days spend their time on the screen. Therefore, the...
^^
Line 5, column 319, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion worth mentioning is that parents are great friends for the pupil. Taking the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, then, therefore, as for, for instance, in addition, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1810.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3550295858 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0311455859 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585798816568 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.829636546 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.285714286 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138791496718 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411379593909 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364887078434 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0740141354047 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226663288692 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.