The graph below shows the availability of various sweeteners in pounds in the USA from 1966 to 2012.
The given line graph illustrates the amounts of sweeteners that were available in pounds in the united states over a 46-year period of time.
Overall, it can be seen that the availability of sweeteners increased until around the year 2000 and then it receded. The amount of refined cane and beet sugars gradually decreased over the first twenty years, then plateaued for the rest of the period. Corn sweeteners had a continuous increase until 1986, followed by some fluctuations before falling for the remaining years. The availability of honey and edible syrups remained relatively low and stable over the years.
From 1966 to 1986, refined cane and beet sugars and core sweeteners followed a very different trend. The sugars started at around 100 pounds per person, while corn sweeteners started only at 18 pounds per person. By 1986, however, the two sweeteners met at 62 pounds. After that, they diverged again before meeting once again in 2007 at 63 pounds. In contrast to sugars and sweeteners, honey and syrups barely changed. They both started at approximately 15 pounds in 1966, so by the end of the period in 2011, they were almost the same.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...nds in the united states over a 46-year period of time. Overall, it can be seen that the a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, then, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 964.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96907216495 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55958849254 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572164948454 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.8293829735 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6363636364 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6363636364 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184089922228 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671442793571 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563291133782 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130228541204 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428515603303 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.