The graph below shows the availability of various sweeteners in the USA from 1966 to 2012. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart depicts the proportion of sweetener types consume consumed in United States (measured by pounds) for 46 years commencing from 1965 grouped into 5 categories.
Overall, the total number of sweetener consumption In United states experiences a decreasing trend over the period.
Between 1966 and 2012, the total quantity of figures in the data showed a fluctuation roughly 110 pound, whereas both Honey and Edible Syrups had a similar trend from the aforementioned type at 140 pound lower in range number than the one. A decrease was witnessed by not only Refined but also Beef Sugar at 60 pound. Corn Sweeteners, at the same time, reached an identical point but saw a reverse trend from just below 20 in the beginning of the period.
By 2012, the accumulation of these had reached a peak before it hadb declined markedly to 10. The oscillation had remained to occur for Honey and Edible Syrups proportion throughout the year. After reaching the highest point, then Corn Sweeteners had fallen moderately to 60 pound. Refined Cone and Beet Sugars had climbed slightly which had ceased higher 5 pound than previous figure
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-11 | Fachri040495 | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | Falah1486 | 67 | view |
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea.What are the reasons and solutions? 78
- Schools use various methods to try and increase grades.What are the different methods they use?Which one is the most effective? 56
- The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where re 73
- Psychological illnesses may not be as obvious as physical disabilities or illnesses. Nevertheless, they are just as disabling in their own way. However, society is more accepting of those with physical than psychological illnesses or disabilities, the lat 84
- The three diagram below show the development of, and plans for, the coastal zone of Brightsea.Summarise the information by choosing and reporting the key features, and make any relevant comparisonsThe growth and forecast at the coastal area of Brightsea c 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 99, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
...e data showed a fluctuation roughly 110 pound, whereas both Honey and Edible Syrups h...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 199, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
...end from the aforementioned type at 140 pound lower in range number than the one. A d...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 312, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
... only Refined but also Beef Sugar at 60 pound. Corn Sweeteners, at the same time, rea...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 276, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
... Sweeteners had fallen moderately to 60 pound. Refined Cone and Beet Sugars had climb...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 359, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
...mbed slightly which had ceased higher 5 pound than previous figure
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 956.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0582010582 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63145476568 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650793650794 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5037862847 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.222222222 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0830866337554 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0327072490324 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.027603836547 0.0843802449381 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.049027913109 0.15604864568 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225243615077 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.