The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emission per person In the United Kingdom, Sweden and Portugal between 1967 and 2007
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the average production of carbon dioxide by one person in four different European countries between 1967 and 2007 measured in metric tons.
Overall, it can be seen that the United Kingdom produced the most amount of carbon dioxide over the period and it is worth to note that the emission of carbon dioxide have upward trend in Italy and Portugal and Sweden has downward trend.
In 1967, CO2 emission in the UK and Sweden stood at approximately 11 and 8.8 respectively. Then during the first 10 years CO2 emission in the UK declined marginally while Sweden saw exponential rise and comprised of 10.2 in 1977. CO2 emission in the UK continued to decline gradually to finish the period at about 8.9 while emission in Sweden decreased significantly to a low of about 5.2 in 2007, it was the lowest figure among four countries.
CO2 emission in Portugal and Italy accounted for about 1.1 and 4.2 in 1967. For the next 4 decades CO2 emission in Portugal and Italy followed a similar trend, increasing steadily to 5 for Portugal and just under 8 for Italy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'trended'.
Suggestion: trended
... emission of carbon dioxide have upward trend in Italy and Portugal and Sweden has do...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'trended'.
Suggestion: trended
...ly and Portugal and Sweden has downward trend. In 1967, CO2 emission in the UK and...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79255319149 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6154802157 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579787234043 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0502553331 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.714285714 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8571428571 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277391501344 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133055210085 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485850957407 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159833138664 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296984778104 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.