The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The line graph illustrates how much carbon dioxide was emitted per person in four European countries from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, Italy was the most environmentally friendly country over the whole period, as opposed to the UK that showed the highest levels of CO2 emitted to the atmosphere. CO2 emissions in Italy and Portugal rose gradually over the period, whereas they declined in the UK and Sweden.
In 1967, CO2 emissions in the UK amounted to more than 10 metric tonnes, in comparison with over 8 in Sweden, just above 4 in Portugal, and slightly under 2 in Italy. By the half of the period, figures for Italy and Portugal had climbed steadily to roughly 3 metric tonnes and around 7, respectively. Meanwhile, the UK had lowered its emissions by about 1 metric tonne, and those of Sweden peaked at just over 10 before falling significantly to about 7.
In the second half of the period, UK CO2 emissions dipped gradually to just below 7 tonnes in 2007, while in Sweden they kept falling to slightly under 6. In contrast, Italian and Portuguese CO2 emissions continued growing and reached figures of nearly 8 tonnes and slightly under 6.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-17 | Clark Jones | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-17 | Clark Jones | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-17 | Clark Jones | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 61
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 78
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 84
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 78
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 956.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82828282828 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66132384878 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550505050505 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.353132437 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 119.5 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289869215265 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126487078959 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661926450376 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1755744436 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480146374332 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.