The table below shows the numbers of visitor to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year afer it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.
The table and pie charts illustrate how many people visited the Ashdown Museum as well as their satisfaction degree after the visit in the year before and after it was refurbished.
Overall, the number of visits increased after the refurbishment. While half of visitors were not pleased with their experience in the first year, after the museum was refurbished three-quarters of those surveyed answered positively.
During the year before the refurbishment, the number of people who visited the museum amounted to 74.000. When surveyed, one in ten reported that were very dissatisfied, and up to two-fifths said that their visit had been unsatisfactory. By comparison, 15% of visitors had enjoyed considerably their visit, and nearly a third said that they were happy to have come. Only 5% of those surveyed refused to respond.
Turning to the year after the museum was improved, the number of visitors had grown to 92.000. The percentage of very satisfied and satisfied people increased significantly to 35 and 40, respectively. In contrast, 15% of visitors disliked their visit and 5% were very disappointed. The proportion of people who did not want to answer remained unchanged.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, third, well, while, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1004.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28421052632 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04317955899 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542105263158 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.2200558498 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2727272727 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2727272727 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384232143129 0.215688989381 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134313760728 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863751420996 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237929635236 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027175670622 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.