The graph indicates the amount of carbon dioxide emissions per person in average from 1967 to 2007 among 5 countries. It is measured in metric tonnes.
Overall, United Kingdom made the largest amount of carbon dioxide, while constantly decreased its emissions during the given time. The average carbon dioxide emission in Sweden also dropped gradually, after rising at the first 10 years. In the case of Italy and Portugal, the amount of emissions augmented in general and surpassed the figure of Sweden in different time.
British made over 10 metric tonne in 1967 and gradually dropped at over 8 metric tonne in 2007. Sweden had similar trend with UK, reaching peak at slightly over 10 metric tonne in 1977 and dramatically decreased to under 6 metric tonne in 2007. On the other hand, Italy and Portugal showed the opposite trend, starting at over 4 metric tonne and under 2 metric tonne in 1967 respectively and reaching at just below 8 metric tonne and under 6 metric tonne in 2007 respectively with little fluctuation. In the case of Italy, its amount of emissions surpassed that of Sweden in 1987 and Portugal also made more than Sweden in 2007.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 29, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'tonne' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'tonnes'.
Suggestion: tonnes
...nt time. British made over 10 metric tonne in 1967 and gradually dropped at over 8...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'tonne' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'tonnes'.
Suggestion: tonnes
... and gradually dropped at over 8 metric tonne in 2007. Sweden had similar trend with ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 172, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'tonne' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'tonnes'.
Suggestion: tonnes
...eaching peak at slightly over 10 metric tonne in 1977 and dramatically decreased to u...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'tonne' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'tonnes'.
Suggestion: tonnes
...ramatically decreased to under 6 metric tonne in 2007. On the other hand, Italy and P...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 337, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'tonne' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'tonnes'.
Suggestion: tonnes
...posite trend, starting at over 4 metric tonne and under 2 metric tonne in 1967 respec...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'tonne' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'tonnes'.
Suggestion: tonnes
... over 4 metric tonne and under 2 metric tonne in 1967 respectively and reaching at ju...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 425, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'tonne' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'tonnes'.
Suggestion: tonnes
...ely and reaching at just below 8 metric tonne and under 6 metric tonne in 2007 respec...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 450, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'tonne' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'tonnes'.
Suggestion: tonnes
...below 8 metric tonne and under 6 metric tonne in 2007 respectively with little fluctu...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88324873096 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48663618771 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482233502538 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2799832056 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.888888889 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201566928678 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102051879493 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834079544973 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177179898838 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676720993755 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.