Some people opine that economic growth is the only solution to tackle with the issues of hunger and poverty, whilst others believe that economic growth should be halted because of its devastating consequences in environment problems. This essay will discuss both views in detail and provide evidences why I agree with the second opinion.
On the one hand, it is argued that economic growth is the sole cure for saving the poor and needy from the hunger and poverty, because financial wealth makes them afford to basic necessities in life. In other words, the corporations which will get benefits from the economic progress will trickle down in forms of financial benefits to be enjoyed the poor people. I disagree with this ideas because this logic justified the imperialism and turned to be not true. For example, most Indians had been suffered from the hunger during the dominance of England and the poverty is still pressing issue in there.
On the other hand, it is obvious that excessive focus on economic growth brings adverse ramifications to the whole world. In terms of under-developed countries, their lowland forests have been cleared and unsustainable agricultural practices have been introduced to produce cash crops, often for export. In my opinion, developed countries are also accelerating global warming in the name of progress with the constant and exorbitant use of fossil fuels which has been the main source of industrialization. As a result, rising sea level is threatening millions of lives in Bangladesh.
In conclusion, while some insist that the economic growth in poor countries is the only way to escape those who are in hunger from the poverty, unsustainable growth will devastate the environment and endanger people around the world with the environmental issues. Some people opine that economic growth is the only solution to tackle with the issues of hunger and poverty, whilst others believe that economic growth should be halted because of its devastating consequences in environment problems. This essay will discuss both views in detail and provide evidences why I agree with the second opinion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...why I agree with the second opinion. On the one hand, it is argued that econo...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...e financial wealth makes them afford to basic necessities in life. In other words, the corporatio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 381, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...njoyed the poor people. I disagree with this ideas because this logic justified the ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 606, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...verty is still pressing issue in there. On the other hand, it is obvious that ex...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing millions of lives in Bangladesh. In conclusion, while some insist that th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1809.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25872093023 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77274841782 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482558139535 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.1326782802 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.153846154 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4615384615 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314901942019 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114008687756 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11584755625 0.0667982634062 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215699399774 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125538677599 0.056905535591 221% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.