The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030.
The line graph compares the data on three different types of transport utilized daily by UK workers over the period from 1970 to 2030.
Overall, it is clear that car is by far the most popular means of transport for UK travellers over the period. While the figure for car and train users rise slightly, bus commuter numbers is opposite.
At the start of the period, car had the highest commuter numbers among all three transports with around 5 million users. Meanwhile, bus and train had lower volumes of commuters which were approximately 4 million and 2 million people respectively in the year 1970. In 2000, the figure for those who drove a car to work climbed to 7 million and the number of people commuting by railway rocketed to a high of 3 million. On the other hand, bus traveller numbers saw a slight drop of 0.5 million people in 2000.
By 2030, the number of people using car is expected to reach a climax of almost 9 million while train user population is also predicted to rise gradually to nearly 5 million people. In contrast, buses will see a steep decline in users and become the least popular choice, with only 3 million daily commuters.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reach a climax of almost 9 million while train user population is also predicted ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60869565217 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47180653246 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584541062802 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2873264821 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25958843698 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117982632175 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542654285394 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159830086674 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556139085268 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.