The graph below shows changes in young adult unemployment rates in England between 1993
and 2012.
the line graph compares levels of unemployment among 16 to 24-years-olds with overall unemployment figures from 1993 to 2012 in England.
Overall, the unemployment ratio was significantly higher for the youth than for the general adults in both london and the rest of England during the 20-year period. And the joblessness in London are more popular than that in the rest of the UK.
In 1993, around 22% of young adults in London were unemployed, after falling to under 15% in 2002, this figure then increased markedly and reached a peak at exactly 25% by 2012. In contrast, there was a considerable decline in the overall unemployment ratio in London from under 15% in 1993 to just about 7% in 2006, although after that this figure rose slightly, it just remained under 10% in 2012.
Similarly, in 1993, the percentage of unemployment among young Labour in the rest of England was approximately 17% , after decreasing to about 11% in 2002, this figure then rose dramatically and by 2012, it peaked at over 20%. Otherwise, there was an downward trend in the general joblessness rate in outer London from exactly 10% in 1993 to just under 5% in 2005, despite minor growths it still remained below 10% by 2012.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the line graph compares levels of unemploym...
^^^
Line 7, column 115, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...he rest of England was approximately 17% , after decreasing to about 11% in 2002, ...
^^
Line 7, column 249, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...eaked at over 20%. Otherwise, there was an downward trend in the general joblessne...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, still, then, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1031.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95673076923 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72238292445 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514423076923 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.6946067203 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.285714286 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7142857143 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202537957792 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965421900392 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560099070065 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133035852377 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466770882774 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.