The figure shows the consumption of four types of meats, including beef, lamb, fish, and chicken, for each person in one week in European countries from 1979 to 2004.
From an overall perspective, lamb ad beef usage decreases sharply, and fish consumption falls gradually over this period. In contrast, people's tendency to use chicken grows up.
The graph illustrates that beef consumption ranks first in 1979 with 220 grams per week per person. Meanwhile, fish with 60 grams per person per week has the lowest rate. The usage of lamb and chicken is approximately equal, 150 grams, in this year.
As the line graphs display, beef and lamb consumption fall dramatically after some rise and down and their usage rate become 110 and 80 grams per person per week respectively in 2004. On the contrary, people eat more chicken, and its usage rate gain 255 grams per person per week and ranks first. The fish consumption has a slight decrease and has the lowest rank in 2004 like 1979.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 172, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...peoples tendency to use chicken grows up The graph illustrates that beef consumpt...
^^^
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...proximately equal 150 grams in this year As the line graphs display beef and lamb...
^^^
Line 4, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ise and down and their usage rate become 110 and 80 grams per person per week res...
^^
Line 4, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...per person per week respectively in 2004 On the contrary people eat more chicken ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, while, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 791.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68047337278 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38424094436 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 169.0 22.4926829268 751% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 791.0 112.824112599 701% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 169.0 22.9334400587 737% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 46.0 5.23603664747 879% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126817976263 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126817976263 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0974001454122 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610471886243 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 85.1 13.2329268293 643% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -74.68 61.2550243902 -122% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 65.7 10.3012195122 638% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.05 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 14.26 8.06136585366 177% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 53.0 11.4329268293 464% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 69.6 10.9970731707 633% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 53.0 11.0658536585 479% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.