The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a
European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make
comparisons where relevant.
The line chart compares the weekly consumption per capita of fish, chicken, beef and lamb in an European country from 1979 to 2004
Overall, It is clear that the consumption of meat and fish followed a downward trend except for chicken.
In 1979, the weekly intake of beef was the highest, at around over 200 grams per person while that of chicken was just under 150 grams
Over the next 25 years, the prior reached a peak and remained stable at under 250 grams between 1984 and 1989, preceding a plummet to about 120 grams in the final year. By contrast, there was a steady increase by 100 grams in the amount of chicken consumed per week per person over the year and hence, chicken became the most favorite meat in 2004
Turning to the weekly intake of fish and lamb, the figure for lamb in 1979 was 150 grams, three times higher than that of fish in the same year. However, during the time recorded, the gap narrowed as the consumption of fish stayed relatively constant while there was a cut-down on the weekly intake of lamb by nearly 100grams.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...pita of fish, chicken, beef and lamb in an European country from 1979 to 2004 O...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, so, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56020942408 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16546426718 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55497382199 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 47.0 22.4926829268 209% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.0016447131 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 217.75 112.824112599 193% => OK
Words per sentence: 47.75 22.9334400587 208% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 9.25 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121761877068 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854345836628 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635320820713 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.083420557054 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543392433605 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.9 13.2329268293 181% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 10.3012195122 176% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.06 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 25.5 11.4329268293 223% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 20.8 10.9970731707 189% => OK
text_standard: 26.0 11.0658536585 235% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.