the graph below shows the consumption of fish and some differen kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The line graph illustrates the fish and other sorts of meat consumed by citizens living in a European country over a period from the year of 1979 to 2004.
It is clear that the amount of consumption of chicken went up from less than 150 grams, reaching to approximately 250 grams in the end, whose highest data was over 250 grams in the year of2002 although there was a decrease in the year of 1982, 1987,and 1990. By contrast, the data of beef consumed saw an opposite trend, it undergone a dramatically fall from 220 grams in 1979 to under 110 grams in the end, while there was a small rise from 1981 to 1983.
The number of lamb saw a similar trend as that of beef. People consumed about 150 grams in 1979, then the amount fall to 110 grams in 2004, followed by a slightly increase which reached to 130 grams in 1988. However, the data of consumed fish remained stable over the 25 years(about 50 grams) although there was a minor decrease.
Overall, the most consumed food by the people of this country changed from beef to chicken, and the least kind food was fish all the time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...whose highest data was over 250 grams in the year of2002 although there was a dec...
^^
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('fall') instead of another adjective.
...med saw an opposite trend, it undergone a dramatically fall from 220 grams in 1979 to under 110 gra...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 153, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
... fall to 110 grams in 2004, followed by a slightly increase which reached to 130 grams in 1988. Ho...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wed by a slightly increase which reached to 130 grams in 1988. However, the data ...
^^
Line 5, column 239, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s in 1988. However, the data of consumed fish remained stable over the 25 years...
^^
Line 5, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ver, the data of consumed fish remained stable over the 25 yearsabout 50 grams ...
^^
Line 5, column 262, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... data of consumed fish remained stable over the 25 yearsabout 50 grams although...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42288557214 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28175497853 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532338308458 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.3993989346 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7142857143 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141190999093 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750296490555 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0910301961138 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118543519631 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0999374628448 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 76.9 61.2550243902 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.95 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.