The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates data about the amount of fish and meat consumption for each person in every week over a twenty-five year period between 1979 and 2004 in a European country.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is downward trends for third Beef, Lamb and Fish, while chicken saw a wild fluctuate rise in its consumption over the period. Fish has the lowest amount proportion in the serving meal of European countries. Although Beef was consumed by European people more than others for about ten years from 1979 until 1989, Chicken has been the most amount of once food proportion for the next years.
Looking at the details, as regards beef consumption, the grams of it which each person has used it up per week started at about 220, then there was a dramatically fluctuated fall and then leveled off at about 120 grams. The lamb consumption is more likely to the beef but also it started at about 150 grams, then dropped to the 75 grams used up in 2004. Fish saw the steadily dwindled from 60 grams in 1979 to 50 grams over the next 10 years. Conversely, chicken consumption has soared in the period of the question from under 150 grams to about 250 grams.
In summary, the graph provides information about how the consumption of chicken increased dramatically while the popularity of these other foods decreased over the period.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, look, so, then, third, while, as regards, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1115.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76495726496 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49256693222 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529914529915 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1213254337 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.888888889 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132821002507 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677460436765 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547704678578 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105238894424 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611046133534 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.