The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
The pie chart compares the percentages of main factors which cause agricultural land becomes less productive around the world, and the table compares the deforestation, over-cultivation, and over-grazing in three different regions around the world over the year of 1990.
It is clear that over-grazing was by far the highest amount of elements of land degradation. We can also see that Europe earned by far the most total degraded among three regions over the period shown.
Looking at the profile of the causes pie chart, we can find that the most problem was about grazing which is over the land potential. To be precise, 35% of land degradation was about over-grazing, and 30% was deforestation that makes the erosion of soil and the last most agent was about 28% named cultivation.
According to the table, Europe was more under-damage in contrary to North America and Oceania due to had 23% of total land degraded over the year1990. The majority of deforestation was 9.8% in Europe while the minority was about 0.2% in North America. Over-cultivation had various amounts over the regions, however, although Europe and North America face the problem of more cultivation about 7.7% and 3.3% respectively, Oceania had no problem with it. Looking at the over-grazing profile for these regions we can find the inverse follows which means Oceania was the first rank of land degraded by 11.3%, then Europe had 5.5%, and finally, North America had just 1.5%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 31, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'causes'' or 'cause's'?
Suggestion: causes'; cause's
... shown. Looking at the profile of the causes pie chart, we can find that the most pr...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, look, so, then, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1227.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09128630705 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86254730922 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514522821577 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 369.0 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5058720864 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.333333333 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7777777778 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12600450626 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607873140771 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756890192801 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103343527959 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0892424104045 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.