The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
he line graph illustrates the trend of fish and meat consumption in a European nations in between two given time periods, 1979 to 2004.
The consumption pattern of meat in the given periods is highly fluctuating except for the fish. In 1979, beef was popular among the European national with the consumption of just over 200 grams per person per week followed by 150 grams per person per week of lamp, below 150 grams per person per week chicken and finally about 55 grams per person per week of fish.The sale of beef is slightly increased in the early years whereas drastic decline is observed after 1989 till 2004 attaining second rank within the category with almost 100 grams per person per week consumption rate. Similarly, the utilization of lamp plummets to just around 55 from 150 grams per person per week within the same period. In contrast, the consumption rate of chicken summits above 250 grams per person per week in the final years while the consumption of fish does not show any significant changes within the time frame.
Overall, the demand of chicken is significantly increasing among the Europeans while the consumption of other meat is rapidly declining.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
he line graph illustrates the trend of fis...
^^
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'lines'.
Suggestion: lines
he line graph illustrates the trend of fish and...
^^^^
Line 3, column 365, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ut 55 grams per person per week of fish.The sale of beef is slightly increased in t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, second, similarly, so, whereas, while, except for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51258830691 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 133.063476916 43.030603864 309% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 164.0 112.824112599 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.3333333333 22.9334400587 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5 5.23603664747 239% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125312941334 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982328721334 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767517244516 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139221085526 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0790767197218 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.2329268293 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.