The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Someland in 1980, 1990 and 2000.
The pie charts shows the proportion of expenditure incurred by the local authorities in Someland in three different time periods-1980, 1990 and 2000. Six various categories of expenditures were measured during the given time frames.
Overall, the three major sectors- transportation, environmental services and higher education were among the significant sectors with regards to budget allocation. higher education has always been the sector with utmost priority.
In 1980, the greatest proportion, 35% of spending was allocated to higher education. The investment followed the similar trend with highest priority in 1990 with 45 percent while a slight decline of 5% in 2000. Similarly, k-12 education also belonged to the top rank in early years whereas the expenditure is steadily declining in the succeeding periods to 18 percent in final year. A rising environmental concern has been depicted with the increase in expenditure from 4 to 5 to 9 percent in the respective years 1980, 1990 and 2000.
The transportation sector too follows an udulating expenditure pattern with 16 percent in 1980. A drop to 6 percent in 1990 and a suprising rise in 2000 with a 22 percent of total spending.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Higher
...ors with regards to budget allocation. higher education has always been the sector wi...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 128, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the highest'.
Suggestion: with the highest
...e investment followed the similar trend with highest priority in 1990 with 45 percent while ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 536, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e respective years 1980, 1990 and 2000. The transportation sector too follows an...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, similarly, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1014.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33684210526 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09488005397 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.534367382 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.4 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217481567699 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.094526216714 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142793152825 0.0843802449381 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138067343359 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118817823394 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.